big matt

whilst i was at work, some pikey stole the seat off my bike.

it was bloody locked to my bike frame with a bloody bike lock aswell.

now i have to stand up when i want to get anywhere.

i'll be looking on ebay for a 'second hand daewoo bike seat, five year
old, very worn and very nicked.'

the little f******.

climate change is giving seals a better chance of making love.

the higher temperatures force seals off the coast of scotland to travel further to find fresh water and as a result give the weaker males a better chance of pulling.

funny, we were talking about this last night and how we don't like climate change because it means less polar bears, thus more seals, thus less penguins. unfortunately for the seals, polar bears and penguins are up there in the top five list of animals (along with puffins and otters).

this madness could have drastic effects on our chart.

what do you get if you mix sally gunnell, steve redgrave (knight of
the realm) and myleene klass with a team of elite agility dogs?

the london 2012 official lottery scratchcard ofcourse...

Labels: news

apparently, only 22 songs for every ipod sold have been bought through itunes.

Labels: news

the killer on the loose in ipswich is big news.

but why does the bbc (and everyone else) feel they have to send their head honcho to broadcast live from ipswich? huw edwards can read a script just as well in ipswich as he can in london.

plus, the beeb have tonnes of journalists there already who could surely do what huw does. it just looks stupid when he passes over 'live for an update' to someone else who is probably not even a mile from where he's stood.

what i think is worse is that when the bbc (and everyone else) think the story is not as important, they all run back to london. the manhunt they reported on earlier this week from ipswich is still going on, so why isn't it as important? plus, these hookers have been disappearing for five weeks now, and huw edwards didn't trot off to suffolk then did he?

it's all about making news look more important than it is or...what's that other word...oh yeh, hype.

so i'm doing some surfing on flickr.

stumbled across a comment in a photo, by a jeff_bgcc and naturally,
click on his profile to look at what kind of photographic genius he
has to show to the world.

on one of his photos i find a comment by a certain peter ellis.
intrigued by peter ellis' profile picture (an elderly man) and what
he's up to leaving comments on pictures of semi naked girls, i follow
the link to his profile to discover he is a 70 year old MARRIED man.

peter has uploaded photos of his son, holidays etc and it all seems
rather innocent. however, his wife obviously has no idea how to use
the internet as peter has 1,297 contacts who all appear to be...ahem,
rather young women who enjoy showing off.

'why stop now?' i thought, and followed a link to vantagesmoker's
photos where i discover a photo of his wife and a rather suggestive
question which i shall let you read for yourself. needless to say,
some weirdo's have indeed answered the question with some gusto and
rather extensive thought (including peter ellis).

most vulgar comment goes to rubedog, whose photo album is somewhat
self centered.

this is unfortunately where the trail ends. i could have continued
clicking, but found the blog potential too much to contain.

i would like to raise this question. do they not realise the world
(including peter ellis' wife) knows what they're up to?!

Labels: surfing